Everything comes to he who waits - PHILIPS

Marc Redorta May 10, 2016

Innovation does not always provide immediate results. Sometimes one has to wait for a long time in order to obtain economic benefits. And the more ahead of its time an idea is, the longer it may take to catch on. This is why large companies often decide to diversify their investments in R+D+I. In strategic terms it is better for them to have options open in future business areas, even if they have to wait for the results, even if some opportunities never arise.

One of the most extreme cases that illustrates this idea features Philips, the firm famous for its lighting products. This Dutch company was founded in 1891 by Gerard Philips and his father Frederik in order to manufacture an invention that, at the time, had already been a great success for 12 years; the electric light bulb1. Artificial light was, in the late 19th century, an invention which makes the emergence of Internet in our lives look completely banal by comparison.


Philips siege in Amsterdam

The Philips family saw the potential of the light bulb immediately, even though they did not understand the real size the business could grow to until they recruited the cleverest member of the family, Anton Philips. It was he, the younger brother, who saw that they needed to invest in engineers and diversify production in order to stay ahead of other competitors. In the 1920s and 1930s they introduced products onto the European market that are now well-established, such as radios, vacuum cleaners and electric shavers.

However, not all their products were so well-received by the market. In July 1936, while Spain was occupied with the first chapters of its civil war, the Philips research laboratory magazine published an article on the advances achieved using neon lights to grow plants 2. The article scientifically demonstrated that efficient artificial illumination could be applied for farming in enclosed areas and with good results.


Image of cityfarm

At the time, the idea did not arouse too much interest. However today it is known as “city farming” and it is almost always mentioned with concepts such as smart cities, sustainability and resilience. What has happened during the last 80 years? Why didn’t the idea succeed before? Firstly, it was not necessary. Traditional agricultural methods produced sufficient food to supply the most advanced societies. In fact the two concepts ‘city and ‘farm’ were not linked until the end of the 1960s in the United Kingdom, and this was due to the hippies, who thought that adding farm animals and small urban vegetable farms was an excellent idea for their communes. A few years later the punks announced that the only crests seen at home would be their own, and the experiment came to an end.

Industry however continued investigating, albeit in a relaxed manner. The main problem was that the fluorescent lights of the time did not provide the amount of light desired. They both used and wasted too much energy, they could not be programmed and they were too expensive to produce and install if they were only to be used to grow lettuce.

However, three letters changed the game: LED. This new technology consumed 75% less than fluorescent lights and lasted 10 times longer, it did not fade, the lights could be programmed and they took up less space and concentrated light more; in short LED lights were a quantum leap in terms of efficiency. All of this, combined with the marked rise of city populations and the reduction of land available for farming, motivated 21st century entrepreneurs to create vertical farms, where cultivation takes place inside warehouses.

At last, the great-grandchildren of the Philips family could begin to reap the benefits of that almost-forgotten research. According to the United Nations, in 2050, world population will have grown by 2,500 million people, and agricultural production volumes will need to increase by 70% in order to satisfy their requirements. Today, 80% of all cultivatable land is already being used. With this dismal scenario for humanity, the solution lies with initiatives such as those of Green Sense Farms, a company located on the outskirts of Chicago that has installed 7,000 Philips LED light bulbs inside an enormous 30,000 m2 warehouse, so as to produce some 4,000 boxes of vegetables a week; vegetables that have been grown under ideal conditions of light in terms of both quality and quantity, without pesticides and out of reach of any inclement weather3. Philips states that its lights can be used to grow a lettuce in only 38 days, when traditional methods take between 65 and 130 days, depending on the variety and the time of year.


Image of a vertical cityfarm

Are we ready to eat lettuce made in a factory? Philips believes so. In 2014 and 2015, the city farming division of the company has tripled its staff numbers and has predicted enormous investments for the immediate future4. The aim is to create modular, scalable systems that include illumination, irrigation, and fertilisation in order to simplify their products. Some of Philips’ clients state that investment returns are seen within one year. And if you still have doubts about the viability of this new business area, the Japanese branch of General Electrics has just reached an agreement with a horticultural business group on the construction of a giant vertical farm, with the aim of rivalling Philip’s market leadership from the very start of this new initiative5.

The conclusions are obvious.


SOURCES

  1. Israel, Paul (2000). Edison: A Life of Invention. John Wiley & Sons.
  2. "Irradiation of plants with neon light”. Philips Technical Review. J.W.M. Roodenburg and G. Zecher. July 1936.
  3. "The light fantastic”. The Economist. 17th of May 2014.
  4. “A Farm on every Street Corner”. Fast Company. Corine Iozzio. April 2015.
  5. The Future of Agriculture? Indoor Farms Powered by LEDs. GE Reports. 18th of September 2014. 2014.
  6. "The latest news in horticulture". Philips. Updated on the 14th of September 2015.

Top